bitcoin
Bitcoin (BITCOIN)
$85,160 0.75%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETHEREUM)
$1,613 1.31%
binancecoin
BNB (BINANCECOIN)
$590.85 -0.37%
solana
Solana (SOLANA)
$138.53 3.45%
ripple
XRP (RIPPLE)
$2.08 0.27%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIBA-INU)
$0.000012 0.06%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.000007 1.74%
bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.000012 3.19%
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BITCOIN)
$85,160 0.75%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETHEREUM)
$1,613 1.31%
binancecoin
BNB (BINANCECOIN)
$590.85 -0.37%
solana
Solana (SOLANA)
$138.53 3.45%
ripple
XRP (RIPPLE)
$2.08 0.27%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIBA-INU)
$0.000012 0.06%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.000007 1.74%
bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.000012 3.19%
bitcoin
Bitcoin (BITCOIN)
$85,160 0.75%
ethereum
Ethereum (ETHEREUM)
$1,613 1.31%
binancecoin
BNB (BINANCECOIN)
$590.85 -0.37%
solana
Solana (SOLANA)
$138.53 3.45%
ripple
XRP (RIPPLE)
$2.08 0.27%
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIBA-INU)
$0.000012 0.06%
pepe
Pepe (PEPE)
$0.000007 1.74%
bonk
Bonk (BONK)
$0.000012 3.19%
Disclosure
Cryptocurrency trading is speculative and your capital is at risk when you trade. We may earn affiliate commissions from some of the products on this page - at no extra cost to you.
SEC Adjusts Binance Lawsuit, Impacting SOL, MATIC Token Classification

Highlights:

  • SEC plans to amend claims against Binance, potentially altering token classification under the law
  • Binance.US prepares for an extended legal battle, emphasizing readiness for the in-depth discovery phase
  • Legal outcomes could set precedents for the regulation of digital tokens globally

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plans to amend its legal complaint against the cryptocurrency exchange Binance. This amendment will refocus the case, potentially shifting away from claims that certain third-party tokens, such as Solana (SOL) and Polygon (MATIC), are unregistered securities. This adjustment could greatly affect how these tokens are classified under regulatory rules.

Advertisement

Banner

SEC Revises Token Claims in Binance Lawsuit

The SEC’s lawsuit against Binance initially listed multiple tokens, including SOL, ADA, and MATIC, alleging that they were effectively securities offered without proper registration. Recently, the SEC expressed plans to change these allegations, which could remove the need for immediate judicial decisions on these tokens.

This shift follows a broader crackdown on Binance for various compliance failures, including the alleged offering of unregistered securities.

During the recent court session, discussions focused on the exact role of these third-party tokens in the ongoing legal case. Binance’s defense team expressed a need to review the amended complaint before proceeding further, particularly with the discovery phase. This change indicates a strategic shift in the SEC’s focus on other aspects of the case against Binance and CZ.

Legal Shifts and Impacts on Crypto Regulation

The move to potentially drop specific allegations against third-party tokens has stirred the legal strategy surrounding the case. If the SEC’s request to amend the complaint is granted, it could redefine the future regulatory landscape for digital assets. Moreover, this development arrives amid heightened scrutiny of cryptocurrency exchanges and their compliance with U.S. securities laws.

The SEC and Binance must jointly decide how to proceed with the lawsuit following the recent court order for a joint response to the disputed issues. This negotiation could set a precedent for future cases, shaping how they are handled. It may influence the broad regulation and classification of digital tokens.

Binance.US Braces for Extended Legal Battle with SEC

Meanwhile, Binance.US, the American branch of the global cryptocurrency exchange, is preparing for a prolonged legal fight with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). After a recent court decision allowed the SEC’s lawsuit to proceed, Binance.US declared its readiness for a lengthy discovery phase.

In a public statement on X, Binance.US affirmed its dedication to regulatory compliance and voiced criticism of the SEC’s enforcement methods. The company labeled the SEC’s regulatory tactics as “regulation by enforcement” and hinted at political motives behind the agency’s actions.

This case between the SEC and Binance highlights the complex relationship between rapidly changing digital currency markets and existing regulatory structures. As the situation unfolds, the investment community and regulatory observers keenly watch for changes that could affect the broader cryptocurrency landscape. The resolution of this case could have far-reaching implications for how digital assets are viewed and regulated globally.

Read More

BC.Game

Advertisement

Banner

Advertisement

Banner

Advertisement

Banner