Cryptocurrency trading is speculative and your capital is at risk when you trade. We may earn affiliate commissions from some of the products on this page - at no extra cost to you.
EU Chat Control


  • Vitalik Buterin praised the EU’s repeal of Chat Control 2.0 as a significant privacy victory.
  • The Chat Control 2.0 proposal aimed to scan encrypted messages, raising privacy concerns.
  • Privacy advocates celebrated the proposal’s withdrawal, emphasizing the importance of end-to-end encryption.

Vitalik Buterin, the co-founder of Ethereum, has publicly praised the European Union for its success in repealing the controversial chat control policy. He considers this a significant victory for privacy rights.

Buterin, a vocal advocate for private communications, has been closely monitoring the EU’s push for chat control on social media platforms. He expressed his gratitude for the collective efforts that led to the denial of the Chat Control 2.0 proposal. He congratulated Europeans on their victory against privacy infringement but cautioned that this might only be the beginning of a challenging era for privacy maintenance.

Background on Chat Control 2.0

The Chat Control 2.0 proposal aimed to introduce mass surveillance of private communications on encrypted messaging platforms like WhatsApp and Signal. This would involve scanning videos, images, and URLs sent on these platforms for incriminating materials using an AI-powered algorithm. Additionally, the algorithm would check this content against a government database of known abuse material. The primary goal was to mitigate child security abuse via these social media platforms.

The proposal had to pass through the Council of the EU, one of the two legislative bodies, before moving to the next legislative stage. During this period, several privacy advocates, including operators of encrypted messaging platforms, argued vehemently against the proposal. They likened it to the mass surveillance described in George Orwell’s “1984.”

Key industry players criticized the proposal for its misalignment with end-to-end encryption, which ensures that messages can be read only by the sender and the intended recipient. Meredith Whittaker, president of the Signal Foundation, highlighted that maintaining the integrity of end-to-end encryption is impossible. Furthermore, exposing encrypted content to surveillance compromises this integrity.

Moreover, she emphasized the inherent conflict between these two objectives. Despite this, such proposals have repeatedly surfaced. A “Don’t Scan Me” petition was launched and garnered significant support, ultimately leading to the withdrawal of the proposal.

Vitalik Buterin’s Perspective on Privacy Preservation

In his follow-up statement, Buterin emphasized that although the rejection of the Chat Control 2.0 proposal is a win for privacy, the battle is far from over. He believes this marks the beginning of a more challenging era for privacy preservation.

Buterin stressed the importance of continued vigilance and advocacy for privacy rights. He acknowledged the efforts of various institutions that played a crucial role in ensuring that the proposal did not come to realization.

The debate over privacy and surveillance is likely to persist as regulatory bodies worldwide grapple with balancing security and privacy. The European Union’s attempt to introduce the Chat Control 2.0 proposal underscores the ongoing tension between these two critical aspects. Consequently, this move highlights the delicate balance that must be maintained.