Highlights:
- The US SEC set a record for crypto penalties in 2024, totaling $4.7 billion.
- This year’s fines represent 63% of the $7.42 billion imposed since 2013.
- The increase underscores the SEC’s intensified scrutiny and enforcement in the crypto sector.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has set a new record for penalties against crypto companies and their executives in 2024. A report from Social Capital Markets on September 9 reveals that the SEC has imposed nearly $4.7 billion in enforcement actions this year, a staggering 3,000% increase from 2023.
This increases the total fines imposed by the SEC since 2013 to $7.42 billion, with 2024 representing 63% of that amount. The sharp rise highlights the SEC’s heightened scrutiny of the crypto sector as it aims to enforce securities regulations in the expanding digital asset market.
Latest: The #SEC has already leveled nearly $4.7B worth of fines against #crypto firms this year despite fewer enforcement actions than in 2023.#Bitcoin #BTC #Crypto #LQR #LaqiraProtocol pic.twitter.com/JGPgZyprGC
— TOBTC (@_TOBTC) September 10, 2024
Terraform Labs Contributed Significantly to Total Fines on Crypto Firms
The bulk of these fines stem from a major case against Terraform Labs and its co-founder, Do Kwon. The $4.47 billion penalty followed the collapse of Terraform’s algorithmic stablecoin, TerraUSD, which caused significant losses for investors. In June 2024, Terraform Labs agreed to a settlement with the SEC over claims that it misled investors about the stability and security of its digital assets.
Terra $LUNA aka Terraform Labs agrees to pay $4.47 billion to resolve a civil lawsuit filed by the US SEC following the firm’s 2022 collapse. pic.twitter.com/EmbKcFZZO7
— Altcoin Daily (@AltcoinDailyio) June 12, 2024
In 2024, the regulator’s 11 enforcement actions resulted in a 3,018% increase in fines compared to the $150.3 million in 2023, despite conducting 19 fewer actions against crypto firms. The total fine amounts included forfeiture, disgorgement, civil penalties, settlements, and prejudgment interest, calculated from when the SEC began the enforcement action.
The report stated:
“This trend indicates a strategic shift by the SEC toward fewer but larger fines, with a focus on making high-impact enforcement actions that set precedents for the entire industry.”Â
SEC Intensified Crypto Crackdown Since 2018Â
This increase in penalties started in 2018 when the SEC began issuing larger fines to digital asset firms. By 2019, fines surged significantly, mainly due to a $1.2 billion penalty against Telegram’s cryptocurrency project (TON). Social Capital Market reported that the case significantly increased the average fine by nearly 2,000% year-on-year to over $70 million in 2019.
Notable cases where the SEC issued fines exceeding $100 million include GTV Media Group, Ripple Labs, and fraudsters John and Tina Barksdale. For many in the web3 community, SEC Chair Gary Gensler has become a prominent symbol of anti-crypto regulatory policies. At Bitcoin 2024, around 20,000 attendees erupted in applause when former President Donald Trump vowed to fire Gensler if he wins re-election. Gensler remains the SEC chair, and the agency’s aggressive crypto crackdown continues.Â
Trump said at the Bitcoin Conference that if elected in November, he would fire Gary Gensler, prevent the U.S. from selling its Bitcoin holdings, and build a strategic Bitcoin reserve. Trump also praised the development of stablecoins and support for the Bitcoin mining industry…
— Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) July 27, 2024
Gensler remains the SEC chair, and the agency’s extensive crypto crackdown persists, widely referred to as “Operation Choke Point 2.0.” Several crypto firms, including Coinbase and Ripple (XRP), are engaged in legal disputes with the SEC. Gensler has asserted that most digital assets qualify as securities and thus do not comply with federal laws.
The SEC’s handling of some cases has also been scrutinized. In a case against D.E.B.T. Box, a federal judge criticized the US SEC for “bad faith conduct” and ordered it to pay $1.8 million in legal costs. The judge also highlighted problems with the agency’s enforcement approach.