UK Stablecoin Caps Could Harm Financial Innovation, Warns Coinbase CEO

Highlights:

• Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong criticizes the UK stablecoin caps limiting innovation.
• UK stablecoin cap proposals include limits for individuals and businesses.
• More than 80,000 people have signed the petition opposing UK stablecoin rules.

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has expressed strong objections about the UK stablecoin caps suggested by the Bank of England. Armstrong is cautious that such restrictions can compromise the status of the UK as a global financial hub. The capped limits might deny the UK from reaping the full benefit of the digital economy. These proposed measures could keep the UK behind as the market of stablecoins grows worldwide.

The UK has been a key player in digital finance. Armstrong, however, claims that this innovation can be stifled by these new restrictions. “The UK is in the process of finalizing the rules on stablecoin, which may render the UK less competitive,” Armstrong wrote on X. The proposed limits, he says, may prevent the market expansion instead of promoting it.

Stablecoin rules in the UK are being finalized, and are at risk of preventing the UK from being globally competitive in the digital economy.

For example, the Bank of England is proposing a cap on stablecoin holdings for individuals and businesses.

The UK has a long history of… pic.twitter.com/afn0gLinld

— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) February 24, 2026

Concerns Over the Bank of England’s Proposal

The Bank of England’s stablecoin proposal has limits on holdings. Individuals would have a £20,000 limit (approximately $26,350), and businesses would have a £10 million ($12.7 million) limit. The measures are to address systemic risk related to stablecoins. Critics, however, point out that these limits may restrict adoption and growth. Others even argue that such proposals may drive business away, stifling innovation in the UK financing industry.

The yield restriction further complicates the issue. The Bank of England further recommends that 40% of the stablecoin reserves be held in non-interest-bearing central bank accounts. This might deter the prospect of expansion in an industry that capitalizes on competitive yields.

The Petition Against UK Stablecoin Caps

Following these proposed stablecoin caps, a petition led by Stand With Crypto UK has been gaining traction. The petition, initiated with the purpose of urging the UK government to implement more friendly crypto policies, has already attracted more than 80,000 signatures. Should it hit 100,000 signatures, it might be debated in Parliament.

The petition is promoting a regulatory environment that fosters innovation and blockchain adoption. It also demands the selection of a blockchain czar to supervise the development of crypto and tokenization policies. Advocates believe such a framework will keep the UK competitive and will not stifle technological progress.

Moreover, the discussion on crypto regulation in the UK is intensifying. Agant CEO Andrew MacKenzie recently noted the risks of crypto regulations in the UK being delayed. MacKenzie said that the UK has been slow in regulatory development, which may damage its competitiveness in digital finance globally.

JUST IN: UK crypto rules too slow to support global hub ambitions, says Agant CEO #crypto pic.twitter.com/tOJzTCnfoW

— CryptoFuseDaily (@cryptofusedaily) February 17, 2026

Global Competition in Digital Finance

The proposed UK stablecoin caps coincide with the increasing global competition in digital finance. Stablecoin regulations are also being developed in other countries, such as the United States and the European Union. The UK exposes itself to the risk of lagging behind should it not adapt quickly to these changes.

Stablecoin regulation has also been a controversial issue in the U.S. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has actively criticized the Clarity Act that would limit stablecoin rewards. The Statehouse intervened in the ongoing discussions on stablecoin yield last week. Although a number of discussions and meetings were conducted between the representatives of the crypto firms and the banking industry, the two parties failed to reach an agreement.